Page 5 of 7

Re: 2026 Hall of Fame Seniors - Last 52 Ranked by Position Group

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 3:13 am
by Brian wolf
Surprised Baughan and Lewis didnt advance.

Re: 2026 Hall of Fame Seniors - Last 52 Ranked by Position Group

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 7:43 am
by JuggernautJ
Brian wolf wrote: Wed Nov 19, 2025 4:07 pm With Hester in as a returner, why not put a gunner in with Tasker?
Vinatieri can get in this or next year as well ...
Not to be argumentative... but the membership of the PFRA didn't see fit to put Tasker in the Hall of Very Good...
I get that Tasker was perhaps the best "gunner" of the specialist era but does that alone qualify him for the Hall of Fame?
We're talking about a Wide Receiver with 51 career catches (and 20 carries) and 7 Pro Bowls as a special teams player.
Does the best "long snapper" deserve enshrinement?

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... skSt00.htm

Re: 2026 Hall of Fame Seniors - Last 52 Ranked by Position Group

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 3:03 pm
by JohnTurney
SeahawkFever wrote: Thu Nov 20, 2025 1:04 am

Of the three receivers if you asked me to pick one, I might take Ellard.

Three pro bowls, two first team all pros, and he ranked third all time in receiving yardage up to his retirement in 1998 as well as sixth in receptions.

Not sure how amazing I’d say the Rams quarterbacks in the 1980’s and early 90’s would be, and the Redskins quarterbacks in the mid 90’s would be either.

if you count the number of "great/very good years," I'd say four years or 1,294 or more. Maybe 4 more good years, 945-1,000-types

his oddity is 54 catches, 811 yards, 5 TDs a "good year" No? What if Dieter Brock is your QB?

Light on TD catches


Morgan, 1 great, near 1,500 yds
and the deep threat years, to me are great---maybe 2-3-4 of those, depending

Taylor had what? A few great one good ... or however people want to count it?


I see pros and cons to each of them, if someone chose Ellard ... (eye test claim, one of best route-runners ever) it would make sense

Re: 2026 Hall of Fame Seniors - Last 52 Ranked by Position Group

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2025 4:26 pm
by Brian wolf
No problem, JJ ... I have the same argument about Hester. Spectacular yes, but a mediocre receiver with only 37 career TDs.
Not a starter to be counted on and is declared the best ever returner, despite other great ones over a long period. During the early 60s, Abe Woodson was declared the greatest who was a great corner as well ...

Still hoping someone keeps Kraft from getting voted in. K Anderson might have his chance.

Re: 2026 Hall of Fame Seniors - Last 52 Ranked by Position Group

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2025 12:44 am
by rewing84
JohnTurney wrote: Wed Nov 19, 2025 6:17 pm
pgconboy wrote: Wed Nov 19, 2025 1:57 pm Fairly uninspiring historical group,
disappoint no 'super' seniors. That's the way of it, I guess.

3 WRs...

How do they rank?
Morgan, elite as deep threat for first part. As a more complete or "#1" type guy ... season averages not that impressive. One monstrous year among a bunch of so-so wons, post-1982

Ellard ... most impressive is 800 yards receiving catching passes from Deiter Brock in 1985. Or maybe 6 TD catches from Jeff Kemp. 3 190-yard games. More consistgen as true #1 -- call it 1986 on ...

both have about same number of 100 yard games. Neither killer playoffstagts. Both excellent punt returners.

How do you separate them? Maybe they are elite HOVGers rather then low-sih HOFers?

Otis Taylor, IMO, 4 great years, even accounting for dead ball era, to me 800 yards in 1972 is a "1,000" yard season -- my issue, even counting 1969 as great year (SB performance) was done by age 30.

uninspiring is a good word
would anyone agree that otis taylor is at best a questionable pick

Re: 2026 Hall of Fame Seniors - Last 52 Ranked by Position Group

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2025 11:44 am
by Brian wolf
There are pros and cons with Taylor, Robert, and some people felt he never met his physical potential but its close.

First off, he was a great receiver on a run-heavy, conservative, defensive team. He helped make them a great team, who won a SB and two AFL Championships. Had the Chiefs defense not had an uncharacteristic bad day against the Raiders in the 1968 divisional playoff, they might have went to another SB. The team was also strong in 1970, but faded down the stretch because the QBs didnt get the ball to Taylor enough. In 1971, the team and Taylor had another great year but couldnt kick their way into the AFC Championship game.

Taylor was big in postseason games, including the 1966 and 69 AFL Championship games. His huge catches against the Jets in the 69 playoff game, would also forshadow his TD catch in the SB that would put away the Vikings. His physicality and propensity for one-handed catches made him a KC legend.

His cons are mostly about getting hurt, which happened in 1968, parts of 70 and later after the team got older and could no longer challenge the Raiders. Getting hurt during the dead-ball era was nothing new for alot of receivers, but the Chiefs simply didnt have the QBs to get the ball to him when he was healthy, and never could get a proper complimentary receiver with him to take away double coverage. Taylor's best years were when the team still had a healthy, Chris Burford to help him on the other side.

Frank Pitts, Gloster Richardson and Elmo Wright had their moments, especially Wright, who played well in the classic 1971 playoff game where the Dolphins double covered Taylor, but these were few and far between. Due to wear and tear, Taylor's last effective season was 1972 when he was 30 years old.

Did Taylor help Len Dawson reach the HOF? Absolutely, but Dawson himself had a tough time staying on the field, and being effective, during the 1970s. Had the team had a more talented backup, which might have reduced their need to run the ball so often, Taylor might already be in the Hall.

Re: 2026 Hall of Fame Seniors - Last 52 Ranked by Position Group

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2025 3:51 pm
by pgconboy
I won't claim to be a wide receiver luminary, though would rank them: Ellard > Morgan > Taylor. As an aside, I think Ellards punt returning could be considered a plus for his case and Morgans perhaps a tie breaker for similar cases. But in this trio it wouldn't be needed for ranking.

It might also be worth noting the embarrassment of riches that Otis had vs Ellard and Morgan.

Defensive HOF teammates: Bobby Bell, Willie Lanier, Buchanan, Robinson, Culp, Emmitt.

Offense: Dawson, Tyrer (w/out homicide),

ST: Stenerud

Franchise: Owner Hunt, Coach Stram

All AFL - TE Arbanas, OG Budde, DE Mays, P Wilson

Assuming these awards and accolades were at least directionally correct, it would be tough to dream up a more fortuitous situation.

Re: 2026 Hall of Fame Seniors - Last 52 Ranked by Position Group

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2025 4:17 pm
by rewing84
Brian wolf wrote: Sat Nov 22, 2025 11:44 am There are pros and cons with Taylor, Robert, and some people felt he never met his physical potential but its close.

First off, he was a great receiver on a run-heavy, conservative, defensive team. He helped make them a great team, who won a SB and two AFL Championships. Had the Chiefs defense not had an uncharacteristic bad day against the Raiders in the 1968 divisional playoff, they might have went to another SB. The team was also strong in 1970, but faded down the stretch because the QBs didnt get the ball to Taylor enough. In 1971, the team and Taylor had another great year but couldnt kick their way into the AFC Championship game.

Taylor was big in postseason games, including the 1966 and 69 AFL Championship games. His huge catches against the Jets in the 69 playoff game, would also forshadow his TD catch in the SB that would put away the Vikings. His physicality and propensity for one-handed catches made him a KC legend.

His cons are mostly about getting hurt, which happened in 1968, parts of 70 and later after the team got older and could no longer challenge the Raiders. Getting hurt during the dead-ball era was nothing new for alot of receivers, but the Chiefs simply didnt have the QBs to get the ball to him when he was healthy, and never could get a proper complimentary receiver with him to take away double coverage. Taylor's best years were when the team still had a healthy, Chris Burford to help him on the other side.

Frank Pitts, Gloster Richardson and Elmo Wright had their moments, especially Wright, who played well in the classic 1971 playoff game where the Dolphins double covered Taylor, but these were few and far between. Due to wear and tear, Taylor's last effective season was 1972 when he was 30 years old.

Did Taylor help Len Dawson reach the HOF? Absolutely, but Dawson himself had a tough time staying on the field, and being effective, during the 1970s. Had the team had a more talented backup, which might have reduced their need to run the ball so often, Taylor might already be in the Hall.
Vaild points on Taylor which i agree with 100% he's a interesting case for sure

Re: 2026 Hall of Fame Seniors - Last 52 Ranked by Position Group

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2025 5:36 pm
by Brian wolf
Maybe I am downplaying Mike Livingston too much, who I think, won his first ten starts for the Chiefs but Livingston also lost a lot of games with the same aging squad. I know his completion pct was low with the Chiefs but had they kept Pete Beathard, who they would send to Houston, where he would help his team win the eastern division in 1967, could he have properly replaced Len Dawson and kept the Chiefs winning? Or at least got the ball more to Otis Taylor?

Re: 2026 Hall of Fame Seniors - Last 52 Ranked by Position Group

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2025 4:13 pm
by rewing84
Next Wednesday 12/3 we find out the three senior finalists