Ken Anderson, Phillip Rivers - if you can only pick ONE of them?

Discuss candidates for the Pro Football Hall of Fame and the PFRA's Hall of Very Good
Brian wolf
Posts: 4380
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:43 am

Re: Ken Anderson, Phillip Rivers - if you can only pick ONE of them?

Post by Brian wolf »

In fairness Robert, Anderson also had very good seasons in 1973 and 76 as well. He struggled in 1977 but had the Bengals on the verge of a divisional title, but it slipped away against a tough Oilers team on the final sunday. Had Cincy and not Pitts won the division, could they had beaten Denver or Oak?
rewing84
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:00 pm

Re: Ken Anderson, Phillip Rivers - if you can only pick ONE of them?

Post by rewing84 »

Ill agree with that 100% Brian your point and arguements are ones that i have no issues with and fully agree with 100%
User avatar
74_75_78_79_
Posts: 2785
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:25 pm

Re: Ken Anderson, Phillip Rivers - if you can only pick ONE of them?

Post by 74_75_78_79_ »

pgconboy wrote: Sat Dec 20, 2025 10:20 pm I am always annoyed by folks that can't answer a simple question posed in a thread. So I'll be annoyed at my own existence for a bit.

I would pick neither. I think together they make excellent gatekeepers for setting the HOF bar. Sort of like the clubs on the old wack-a-mole arcade game.
I've opined that here at least a couple times about Anderson being a 'gatekeeper' (used that very term). But considering just how 'big' the Hall now is, it looks like both will get in after all.

Fair or not, I give Ken the nod because of he at least leading his team to a Super Bowl. Super-tough competition in the '70s with Mia/Oak/Pit in their conference as well as WHO Cincy, indeed, played in SBXVI is a nice additive to his case as well. Fair or not, had Ken won it in Pontiac, he's in Canton by now (kind-of like Namath being in because he won SBIII).
sluggermatt15
Posts: 688
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2015 4:57 pm

Re: Ken Anderson, Phillip Rivers - if you can only pick ONE of them?

Post by sluggermatt15 »

74_75_78_79_ wrote: Tue Dec 23, 2025 12:19 pm
pgconboy wrote: Sat Dec 20, 2025 10:20 pm I am always annoyed by folks that can't answer a simple question posed in a thread. So I'll be annoyed at my own existence for a bit.

I would pick neither. I think together they make excellent gatekeepers for setting the HOF bar. Sort of like the clubs on the old wack-a-mole arcade game.
I've opined that here at least a couple times about Anderson being a 'gatekeeper' (used that very term). But considering just how 'big' the Hall now is, it looks like both will get in after all.

Fair or not, I give Ken the nod because of he at least leading his team to a Super Bowl. Super-tough competition in the '70s with Mia/Oak/Pit in their conference as well as WHO Cincy, indeed, played in SBXVI is a nice additive to his case as well. Fair or not, had Ken won it in Pontiac, he's in Canton by now (kind-of like Namath being in because he won SBIII).
Anderson also won MVP and OPOY awards. Rivers did not.
Post Reply