Ken Anderson, Phillip Rivers - if you can only pick ONE of them?
-
Brian wolf
- Posts: 4380
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:43 am
Re: Ken Anderson, Phillip Rivers - if you can only pick ONE of them?
In fairness Robert, Anderson also had very good seasons in 1973 and 76 as well. He struggled in 1977 but had the Bengals on the verge of a divisional title, but it slipped away against a tough Oilers team on the final sunday. Had Cincy and not Pitts won the division, could they had beaten Denver or Oak?
Re: Ken Anderson, Phillip Rivers - if you can only pick ONE of them?
Ill agree with that 100% Brian your point and arguements are ones that i have no issues with and fully agree with 100%
- 74_75_78_79_
- Posts: 2785
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:25 pm
Re: Ken Anderson, Phillip Rivers - if you can only pick ONE of them?
I've opined that here at least a couple times about Anderson being a 'gatekeeper' (used that very term). But considering just how 'big' the Hall now is, it looks like both will get in after all.pgconboy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 20, 2025 10:20 pm I am always annoyed by folks that can't answer a simple question posed in a thread. So I'll be annoyed at my own existence for a bit.
I would pick neither. I think together they make excellent gatekeepers for setting the HOF bar. Sort of like the clubs on the old wack-a-mole arcade game.
Fair or not, I give Ken the nod because of he at least leading his team to a Super Bowl. Super-tough competition in the '70s with Mia/Oak/Pit in their conference as well as WHO Cincy, indeed, played in SBXVI is a nice additive to his case as well. Fair or not, had Ken won it in Pontiac, he's in Canton by now (kind-of like Namath being in because he won SBIII).
-
sluggermatt15
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2015 4:57 pm
Re: Ken Anderson, Phillip Rivers - if you can only pick ONE of them?
Anderson also won MVP and OPOY awards. Rivers did not.74_75_78_79_ wrote: ↑Tue Dec 23, 2025 12:19 pmI've opined that here at least a couple times about Anderson being a 'gatekeeper' (used that very term). But considering just how 'big' the Hall now is, it looks like both will get in after all.pgconboy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 20, 2025 10:20 pm I am always annoyed by folks that can't answer a simple question posed in a thread. So I'll be annoyed at my own existence for a bit.
I would pick neither. I think together they make excellent gatekeepers for setting the HOF bar. Sort of like the clubs on the old wack-a-mole arcade game.
Fair or not, I give Ken the nod because of he at least leading his team to a Super Bowl. Super-tough competition in the '70s with Mia/Oak/Pit in their conference as well as WHO Cincy, indeed, played in SBXVI is a nice additive to his case as well. Fair or not, had Ken won it in Pontiac, he's in Canton by now (kind-of like Namath being in because he won SBIII).